Preventive Care in Nursing and Midwifery Journal
Volume 15, Issue 4 (12-2025)
Prev Care Nurs Midwifery J 2025, 15(4): 0-0 |
Back to browse issues page
Ethics code: Confidentiality and Anonymity, Principle of Beneficence, respect for authonomy
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Jimmy Agada J, Wankasi Idubamo H. Dissemination and Implementation Strategies for Doula Support Services in Bayelsa State, Nigeria: A Quantitative Cross-Sectional Survey. Prev Care Nurs Midwifery J 2025; 15 (4)
URL: http://nmcjournal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-998-en.html
URL: http://nmcjournal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-998-en.html
Department of Maternal and Child Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing Sciences, Niger Delta University, Wilberforce Island Bayelsa State, Nigeria. , jessicaagada@ndu.edu.ng
Abstract: (41 Views)
Background: Critical shortages of skilled birth attendants due to brain drain have compromised the delivery of respectful, person-centred maternity care in Nigeria. Integrating doula support services has been proposed to complement midwifery care and bridge this gap. This study quantified stakeholders' views on effective approaches for disseminating and implementing these services in Bayelsa State.
Objectives: This cross-sectional study aimed to: 1) assess stakeholders' knowledge of doula services, 2) identify their preferred dissemination and implementation strategies, and 3) examine associations between knowledge and demographic/professional characteristics.
Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional census survey was conducted among 101 maternal health stakeholders (midwives and nursing directors) from two tertiary hospitals and two health governance bodies in Bayelsa State. Data were collected using a validated, researcher-structured questionnaire. The analyses included descriptive statistics and inferential statistics (Chi-square test and odds ratios).
Results: All 101 participants (100%) correctly defined a doula's role. Over 97% agreed on community-based outreach strategies using health talks and tailored messaging. For implementation, there was unanimous (100%) agreement on the need for government policy, standardized training, and clear referral pathways. Midwives were the preferred clinical leaders (92.1%). Overall, 92.1% of stakeholders had good knowledge, which was significantly associated with more years of work experience (OR: 1.13; p=0.045).
Conclusion: Stakeholders strongly endorse a scalable implementation model featuring policy integration, midwife-led coordination, culturally adapted community dissemination, and a structured framework for training, referral, and supervision. This model presents a viable strategy to mitigate workforce shortages and institutionalise respectful maternity care in Bayelsa State.
Objectives: This cross-sectional study aimed to: 1) assess stakeholders' knowledge of doula services, 2) identify their preferred dissemination and implementation strategies, and 3) examine associations between knowledge and demographic/professional characteristics.
Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional census survey was conducted among 101 maternal health stakeholders (midwives and nursing directors) from two tertiary hospitals and two health governance bodies in Bayelsa State. Data were collected using a validated, researcher-structured questionnaire. The analyses included descriptive statistics and inferential statistics (Chi-square test and odds ratios).
Results: All 101 participants (100%) correctly defined a doula's role. Over 97% agreed on community-based outreach strategies using health talks and tailored messaging. For implementation, there was unanimous (100%) agreement on the need for government policy, standardized training, and clear referral pathways. Midwives were the preferred clinical leaders (92.1%). Overall, 92.1% of stakeholders had good knowledge, which was significantly associated with more years of work experience (OR: 1.13; p=0.045).
Conclusion: Stakeholders strongly endorse a scalable implementation model featuring policy integration, midwife-led coordination, culturally adapted community dissemination, and a structured framework for training, referral, and supervision. This model presents a viable strategy to mitigate workforce shortages and institutionalise respectful maternity care in Bayelsa State.
Keywords: Doula Support Services, Maternal Health Services, Program Implementation, Health Knowledge, Nigeria
Type of Study: Orginal research |
Subject:
Midwifery
References
1. Tukur J, Lavin T, Adanikin A, Abdussalam M, Bankole K, Ekott MI, et al. Quality and outcomes of maternal and perinatal care for 76,563 pregnancies reported in a nationwide network of Nigerian referral-level hospitals. EClinicalMedicine. 2022;47:101411. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101411] [PMID]
2. Akinsola KO, Olasupo O, Salako J, Sanaka JZ, Samuel RN, Bakare O, et al. "I went to the primary health centre close to my workplace, but their capacity cannot deliver the baby": exploring why women choose different providers for maternal health services in Nigeria. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025;25(1):339. [https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07382-w] [PMID]
3. Bolan N, Cowgill KD, Walker K, Kak L, Shaver T, Moxon S, et al. Human Resources for Health-Related Challenges to Ensuring Quality Newborn Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2021;9(1):160-76. [https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00362] [PMID]
4. Bohren MA, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C, Fukuzawa RK, Cuthbert A. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;7(7):CD003766. [https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub6] [PMID]
5. Hodnett ED, Gates S, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(3):CD003766. [https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003766]
6. Oluwatola T, Isiaka SD, Omeje O, Oni F, Samuel OW, Sampson S, et al. Assessment of quality of maternal and newborn care and its determinants: a national study of primary health care facilities in Nigeria. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025;25(1):921. [https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12957-6] [PMID]
7. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50. [https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-50] [PMID]
8. Glasgow RE, Harden SM, Gaglio B, Rabin B, Smith ML, Porter GC, et al. RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review. Front Public Health. 2019;7:64. [https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00064] [PMID]
9. Gaglio B, Shoup JA, Glasgow RE. The RE-AIM framework: a systematic review of use over time. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(6):e38-46. [https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301299] [PMID]
10. Powell BJ, Waltz TJ, Chinman MJ, Damschroder LJ, Smith JL, Matthieu MM, et al. A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. Implement Sci. 2015;10:21. [https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0209-1] [PMID]
11. Waltz TJ, Powell BJ, Matthieu MM, Damschroder LJ, Chinman MJ, Smith JL, et al. Use of concept mapping to characterize relationships among implementation strategies and assess their feasibility and importance: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) study. Implement Sci. 2015;10:109 [https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0295-0] [PMID]
12. Safon CB, McCloskey L, Gordon SH, Cole MB, Clark J. Medicaid Reimbursement for Doula Care: Policy Considerations From a Scoping Review. Med Care Res Rev. 2024;81(4):311-26. [https://doi.org/10.1177/10775587231215221] [PMID]
13. Essen B, Wickramasinghe A, Eriksson L. Overreliance on cultural doulas: the paradox of entrusting the communication and care of high-risk migrant women to cultural doulas. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025;25(1):574
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07700-2 [https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07700-2.] [PMID]
14. Khaw SM, Homer CSE, Dearnley R, O'Rourke K, Akter S, Bohren MA. Collaborative relationships between doulas and maternity care providers when supporting migrant women during labour and birth. Midwifery. 2023;125:103791. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2023.103791] [PMID]
15. Wang H, Zhang Y, Yue S. Exploring barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of home rehabilitation care for older adults with disabilities using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). BMC Geriatr. 2023;23(1):292. [https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-03976-1] [PMID]
16. Colton ZA, Liles SM, Griffith MM, Stanek CJ, Walden J, King A, et al. Using the consolidated framework for implementation research to identify challenges and opportunities for implementing a reproductive health education program into sickle cell disease care. J Pediatr Psychol. 2025;50(1):30-9 :
https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsae031 [https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsae031.] [PMID]
17. Olde Loohuis KM, de Kok BC, Bruner W, Jonker A, Salia E, Tuncalp O, et al. Strategies to improve interpersonal communication along the continuum of maternal and newborn care: A scoping review and narrative synthesis. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023;3(10):e0002449. [https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0002449] [PMID]
18. Ahmed SAE, Mahimbo A, Dawson A. Quality intrapartum care expectations and experiences of women in sub-Saharan African Low and Low Middle-Income Countries: a qualitative meta-synthesis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23(1):27 [https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05319-1] [PMID]
19. Fernandez-Leon P, Lima-Serrano M, Fagundo-Rivera J, Martinez-Montilla JM. Planning, implementation, evaluation, and sustainment of digital health interventions for adolescent substance use prevention: a systematic review of influencing factors based on the RE-AIM framework. Health Educ Res. 2025;40(3) [https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyaf021] [PMID]
20. Holtrop JS, Estabrooks PA, Gaglio B, Harden SM, Kessler RS, King DK, et al. Understanding and applying the RE-AIM framework: Clarifications and resources. J Clin Transl Sci. 2021;5(1):e126. [https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.789] [PMID]
21. Damschroder LJ, Reardon CM, Widerquist MAO, Lowery J. The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback. Implement Sci. 2022;17(1):75 [https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0] [PMID]
22. Safaeinili N, Brown-Johnson C, Shaw JG, Mahoney M, Winget M. CFIR simplified: Pragmatic application of and adaptations to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) for evaluation of a patient-centered care transformation within a learning health system. Learn Health Syst. 2020;4(1):e10201. [https://doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10201] [PMID]
23. Marshall C, Nguyen A, Yang CE, Gomez AM. Facilitators and Barriers to Medicaid Doula Benefit Implementation in California: Perspectives From Managed Care Plans and Risk-Bearing Organizations. Womens Health Issues. 2024;34(5):465-72.https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.whi.2024.05.006 [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2024.05.006] [PMID]
24. Mabiala-Maye G, Olabanji K, King KM, Maloney S, Abresch C. Exploring innovative models of doula services in maternity care: A qualitative study on advancing equity and addressing disparities. Womens Health (Lond). 2025;21:17455057251345574. [https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057251345574] [PMID]
25. Farewell CV, Gahrns J, Pangalangan J, Curl E, Pangalangan A. Community-based doulas and medicaid expansion: a resource-based approach to support the well-being of low-income postpartum women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025;25(1):757 [https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07855-y] [PMID]
26. Kang E, Stowe N, Burton K, Ritchwood TD. Characterizing the utilization of doula support services among birthing people of color in the United States: a scoping review. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):1588. [https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19093-6] [PMID]
27. Kassie A, Wale A, Girma D, Amsalu H, Yechale M. The role of traditional birth attendants and problem of integration with health facilities in remote rural community of West Omo Zone 2021: exploratory qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):425. [https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04753-5] [PMID]
28. Blaise P, Kegels G. A realistic approach to the evaluation of the quality management movement in health care systems: a comparison between European and African contexts based on Mintzberg's organizational models. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2004;19(4):337-64. [https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.769] [PMID]
29. Reardon CM, Damschroder LJ, Ashcraft LE, Kerins C, Bachrach RL, Nevedal AL, et al. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) User Guide: a five-step guide for conducting implementation research using the framework. Implement Sci. 2025;20(1):39 [https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-025-01450-7] [PMID]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |